Sequels strife

Ahh, vague omens and mysterious portents. Tangled webs of fate intertwined with the branches of destiny, blown by the capricious winds of happenstance. News, news....uh, actually there is some news!

Moderator: ZFP Peacekeepers

User avatar
Stickman_king_28
Hunam adventurer
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2017 8:22 pm
Location: [insery unfunny reference here]

Re: Sequels strife

Post by Stickman_king_28 » Fri Jan 12, 2018 4:49 pm

OMIGAWD
LETHAL FLAMING WHEELS!

User avatar
sakalava47
Orz *camper*
Posts: 120
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 7:44 pm

Re: Sequels strife

Post by sakalava47 » Fri Feb 16, 2018 3:45 pm

I am an attorney and I see people fighting over what seems like silly things all the time.

But you have to understand the feelings that people have over personal issues. People invest so much of themselves into businesses, property, creative universes (like Star Control) that it becomes very painful to see someone else taking it from you. So I can see where Paul and Fred are coming from. And Star Dock has paid money for the right to create a new game and they want some control over the direction it is going.

Having said this, they all need to get a good mediator and work something out.

User avatar
Alvarin
ZFP Peacekeeper
Posts: 2040
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 7:12 am
Location: Israel

Re: Sequels strife

Post by Alvarin » Thu Feb 22, 2018 7:51 pm

To be angry is to punish yourself for the errors of others.

User avatar
palmpet
Ilwrath torturer
Posts: 434
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2015 7:36 pm
Location: Hillopia, currently imprisoned in Invictler Slave Hive.

Re: Sequels strife

Post by palmpet » Thu Feb 22, 2018 10:01 pm

"What's the point in being grown-up if you can't be childish sometimes."

User avatar
Draxas
Atum-ta the Sixth
Posts: 1297
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:09 am
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Sequels strife

Post by Draxas » Fri Feb 23, 2018 4:33 am

And that eliminates any doubt in my mind. Fred, Paul, may your lawyers knock 'em dead, and godspeed.

User avatar
Death 999
ZFP Peacekeeper
Posts: 1670
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:07 pm

Re: Sequels strife

Post by Death 999 » Fri Feb 23, 2018 5:29 pm

Pretty much, yeah. I made a more full response at the UQM boards, but it basically amounts to Stardock's complaint being a joke except for one tiny thing, and TFB's complaint being really solid.

User avatar
Quasispatial
Yehat Revolutionist
Posts: 646
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:10 am
Location: Sweden

Re: Sequels strife

Post by Quasispatial » Fri Feb 23, 2018 5:43 pm

Yeah. My guess, Stardock was relatively fine with Fred & Paul's project right up until the point where the hype for Shadow of the Precursors began to overshadow Star Control: Origins. The whole "fred and paul are stealing the community respect and the like" thing (along with SotP allegedly trying to "piggyback" on SC:O hype) sort of gave that element away, if you read between the lines. Now they want to knock out the competition, but of course, they have no proper basis to do it from. The whole idea is sad because the games don't have to be opposed to each other at all. All they really accomplished was to disappoint people. I've certainly lost any respect I might have had for Stardock with this move.
"Sentient life. We are the Ur-Quan. Independence is intolerable. Blah, blah, blah." - the Spathi High Council, Star Control II.

User avatar
vok3
Hunam adventurer
Posts: 24
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 3:47 pm

Re: Sequels strife

Post by vok3 » Fri Feb 23, 2018 6:22 pm

I think it's entirely possible Stardock genuinely believed/believes they did buy all the rights they claim to have, even if Reiche is absolutely correct in his claim that the rights all reverted. That would make this a giant and stupid misunderstanding, for which the blame could be assigned either to Atari for not checking they actually could sell what they claimed to sell, to Stardock for not checking they could actually buy what they thought they were buying, or to some combination possibly including Ford & Reiche, depending on what happened.

The one thing I do not understand is Stardock's claim that they requested Ford & Reiche show them some evidence backing up their claim to have the rights and that Ford & Reiche refused. If that actually happened I just can't understand why they would fail to do something so simple. And if it didn't happen, I can't understand that either - that Stardock might lie about something so easily verifiable.

I hope we find out the truth, one way or another. I also hope this gets settled ASAP.

User avatar
Shiver
Arilou wiseguy
Posts: 205
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:03 am

Re: Sequels strife

Post by Shiver » Fri Feb 23, 2018 8:57 pm

Wow. Could this dispute be any uglier?

User avatar
Eth
Shining Being of Pure Light and Blissful Love
Posts: 1042
Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:39 am
Location: USA

Re: Sequels strife

Post by Eth » Fri Feb 23, 2018 10:27 pm

Stardock’s claim, that the Star Control trademark has fame and respect accrued to it, is absurd. We all saw the release of Star Control 3. It was obvious where StarCon was going. I am not a Star Control fan; I’m a fan of Paul and Fred’s games. I played the hell out of Archon The Unholy War, and Skylanders. Of course there were collaborators on Star Control II. That doesn‘t mean that Paul and Fred aren’t the primary authors of that game.

This lawsuit has likely doomed SC Origins one way or another. Either Stardock will lose the rights to the SC trademark, or they will have torpedoed the chances fans had for the Paul and Fred authored SC2 sequel the fans have wanted for the last 25 years, incurring those fans’ wrath.

Post Reply